Someone asks you: "If artificial intelligence can now answer everything, do we still need religious constants that never change?" Write a response that explains the difference between a tool that helps with understanding and organisation, and the source of ruling on religious constants.
Points for self-review
- Did your response make clear that artificial intelligence is a supporting tool, not a source of religious ruling?
- Did you separate "organising knowledge" from "establishing religious truth"?
- Did you close with a question or a point that opens a calm conversation rather than shutting the discussion down?